ZERO WORLD RESEARCHLiterature database on amino acids & organic acids

Analysis of the efficacy, safety, and cost of alternative forms of creatine available for purchase on Amazon.com: are label claims supported by science?

Heliyon2022Escalante G, Gonzalez AM, St Mart D, et al.
Study designOther primary literature
SubjectUnknown

Record checks

Study design
Other primary literature
Subject
Unknown
Publication year
2022
Source
doi.org
Abstract display
Shown here
Publication status
Active
Status checked
17 Aug 2026
Collected
13 Aug 2026
Freshness
Current
Review stage
Automated
Record status
Published

Abstract

Creatine monohydrate (CM) is an established and effective dietary supplement, but it is not the only form of creatine. We analyzed forms of creatine for sale on Amazon.com and evaluated if the advertised claims are supported by the available scientific evidence. We also analyzed the cost per gram of the forms of creatine. A total of 175 creatine supplements were included and we reported the total creatine content per serving, form(s) of creatine in products, product claims, and prevalence of products third party certified. The identified products contained 16 forms of creatine other than CM. The prevalence of products containing functional ingredients with CM or forms of creatine was 29.7%, and the prevalence of products containing blends of different forms of creatine was 21.7%. Only 8% of products were third party certified. The products using only CM (n = 91) had a mean price per gram of $0.12 ± 0.08, whereas products using only other forms of creatine (n = 32) had a mean price per gram of $0.26 ± 0.17. Approximately 88% of alternative creatine products in this study are classified as having limited to no evidence to support bioavailability, efficacy, and safety.

DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12113

PMID 36544833

View source →