Does caffeine consumption affect laparoscopic skills in a motion tracking analysis? A prospective, randomized, blinded crossover trial.
カフェイン摂取はモーションキャプチャ解析における腹腔鏡手術スキルに影響を与えるか?前向き無作為化盲検クロスオーバー試験 (機械翻訳の邦題)
記録の確認項目
- 研究デザイン
- ランダム化比較試験
- 対象
- ヒト
- 出版年
- 2022
- 出典
- doi.org
- 抄録の表示
- 表示あり
- 出版状態
- 有効な記録
- 状態確認日
- 2026/08/17
- 収集日
- 2026/08/03
- 鮮度
- 確認期限内
- 確認段階
- 自動処理
- 記録状態
- 公開
日本語要約(機械生成)
本研究は、カフェイン摂取が腹腔鏡手術のパフォーマンスに及ぼす影響を検討するため、腹腔鏡初心者50名を対象に、プラセボとカフェイン200mg摂取時の4つの腹腔鏡タスク(PEG移動、精密切断、胆嚢切除、結紮)を比較した前向き無作為化盲検クロスオーバー試験である。主要評価項目はタスク時間、エラー数、OSATSスコア、機器動作解析(IMA)によるパフォーマンス評価とした。結果、タスク時間、IMAパラメータ(機器体積、経路長、アイドル時間、速度、加速度、視野外時間)、OSATSスコアは両群間で有意差を認めなかった。一方、円形切断タスクにおいて、特定のエラー基準がカフェイン群で有意に多く発生した(34% vs 16%、p<0.05)。結論として、カフェイン摂取は腹腔鏡初心者の全体的なパフォーマンスを向上も低下もさせないが、一部のエラー発生に悪影響を及ぼす可能性が示唆された。
この要約は公開抄録のみを根拠にAIが機械的に生成したものです。正確な内容は原文を確認してください。
抄録
Background: Coffee can increase vigilance and performance, especially during sleep deprivation. The hypothetical downside of caffeine in the surgical field is the potential interaction with the ergonomics of movement and the central nervous system. The objective of this trial was to investigate the influence of caffeine on laparoscopic performance.Methods: Fifty laparoscopic novices participated in this prospective randomized, blinded crossover trial and were trained in a modified FLS curriculum until reaching a predefined proficiency. Subsequently, all participants performed four laparoscopic tasks twice, once after consumption of a placebo and once after a caffeinated (200 mg) beverage. Comparative analysis was performed between the cohorts. Primary endpoint analysis included task time, task errors, OSATS score and a performance analysis with an instrument motion analysis (IMA) system.Results: Fifty participants completed the study. Sixty-eight percent of participants drank coffee daily. The time to completion for each task was comparable between the caffeine and placebo cohorts for PEG transfer (119 s vs 121 s; p = 0.73), precise cutting (157 s vs 163 s; p = 0.74), gallbladder resection (190 s vs 173 s; p = 0.6) and surgical knot (171 s vs 189 s; p = 0.68). The instrument motion analysis showed no significant differences between the caffeine and placebo groups in any parameters: instrument volume, path length, idle, velocity, acceleration, and instrument out of view. Additionally, OSATS scores did not differ between groups, regardless of task. Major errors occurred similarly in both groups, except for one error criteria during the circle cutting task, which occurred significantly more often in the caffeine group (34% vs. 16%, p < 0.05).Conclusion: The objective IMA and performance scores of laparoscopic skills revealed that caffeine consumption does not enhance or impair the overall laparoscopic performance of surgical novices. The occurrence of major errors is not conclusive but could be negatively influenced in part by caffeine intake.
MeSH
DOI 10.1007/s00464-021-08783-6
PMID 34782961
原文・出典を見る →