ZERO WORLD RESEARCHアミノ酸・有機酸の学術文献データベース

Post-exercise branched chain amino acid supplementation does not affect recovery markers following three consecutive high intensity resistance training bouts compared to carbohydrate supplementation.

運動後の分岐鎖アミノ酸補給は、3日間連続の高強度レジスタンストレーニング後の回復マーカーに、炭水化物補給と比較して影響を及ぼさない (機械翻訳の邦題)

Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition2016Kephart WC, Mumford PW, McCloskey AE, et al.
研究デザインランダム化比較試験
対象ヒト

記録の確認項目

研究デザイン
ランダム化比較試験
対象
ヒト
出版年
2016
出典
doi.org
抄録の表示
表示あり
出版状態
有効な記録
状態確認日
2026/08/17
収集日
2026/08/03
鮮度
確認期限内
確認段階
自動処理
記録状態
公開

日本語要約(機械生成)

本研究は、分岐鎖アミノ酸と炭水化物の混合補給が、炭水化物のみの補給と比較して、3日間の高強度レジスタンストレーニング後の筋損傷マーカーを軽減し、パフォーマンスを維持するかを検討した。健康なレジスタンストレーニング経験のある男性30名を対象に、介入前後で最大筋力、膝伸展トルク、筋電図活動、血清ミオグロビン濃度、主観的筋痛を測定した。参加者は最大筋力の80%でスクワットを10セット×5回を3日間実施し、各運動直後と24時間後にBCAA+CHOまたはCHOのみを摂取した。その結果、1RMスクワット筋力と等速性ピークトルクは両群で同様に低下し、血清ミオグロビン濃度と筋痛は補給の種類に関わらず増加した。単球比率のみ群間交互作用が認められ、BCAA+CHO群で増加が抑制された。結論として、BCAA+CHO補給はCHOのみと比較して、筋力低下や筋損傷・筋痛の回復を改善しなかった。

この要約は公開抄録のみを根拠にAIが機械的に生成したものです。正確な内容は原文を確認してください。

抄録

Background: Amino acid supplementation has been shown to potentially reduced exercise-induced muscle soreness. Thus, the purpose of this study was to examine if branched chain amino acid and carbohydrate (BCAACHO) versus carbohydrate-only sports drink (CHO) supplementation attenuated markers of muscle damage while preserving performance markers following 3 days of intense weight training.Methods: Healthy resistance-trained males (n = 30) performed preliminary testing (T1) whereby they: 1) donated a baseline blood draw, 2) performed knee extensor dynamometry to obtain peak quadriceps isometric and isokinetic torque as well as electromyography (EMG) activity at 60°/s and 120°/s, and 3) performed a one repetition maximum (1RM) barbell back squat. The following week participants performed 10 sets x 5 repetitions at 80 % of their 1RM barbell back squat for 3 consecutive days and 48 h following the third lifting bout participants returned for (T2) testing whereby they repeated the T1 battery. Immediately following and 24 h after the three lifting bouts, participants were randomly assigned to consume one of two commercial products in 600 mL of tap water: 1) BCAAs and CHO (3 g/d L-leucine, 1 g/d L-isoleucine and 2 g/d L-valine with 2 g of CHO; n = 15), or 2) 42 g of CHO only (n = 15). Additionally, venous blood was drawn 24 h following the first and second lifting bouts and 48 h following the third bout to assess serum myoglobin concentrations, and a visual analog scale was utilized prior, during, and after the 3-d protocol to measure subjective perceptions of muscular soreness.Results: There were similar decrements in 1RM squat strength and isokinetic peak torque measures in the BCAA-CHO and CHO groups. Serum myoglobin concentrations (p = 0.027) and perceived muscle soreness (p < 0.001) increased over the intervention regardless of supplementation. A group*time interaction was observed for monocyte percentages (p = 0.01) whereby BCAA-CHO supplementation attenuated increases in this variable over the duration of the protocol compared to CHO supplementation.Conclusion: BCAA-CHO supplementation did not reduce decrements in lower body strength or improve select markers of muscle damage/soreness compared to CHO supplementation over three consecutive days of intense lower-body training.

MeSH

AdultAmino Acids, Branched-ChainBiomarkersDietary CarbohydratesDietary SupplementsHumansInflammationMaleMuscle ContractionMuscle FatigueMuscle StrengthMuscle, SkeletalMyalgiaPhysical EnduranceResistance TrainingSports Nutritional Physiological Phenomena

DOI 10.1186/s12970-016-0142-y

PMID 27468258

原文・出典を見る →