Intravenous branched-chain amino acid administration for the acute treatment of hepatic encephalopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
肝性脳症の急性期治療における分岐鎖アミノ酸静脈内投与:系統的レビューとメタ分析 (機械翻訳の邦題)
記録の確認項目
- 研究デザイン
- レビュー
- 対象
- 未確定
- 出版年
- 2025
- 出典
- doi.org
- 抄録の表示
- 表示あり
- 出版状態
- 有効な記録
- 状態確認日
- 2026/08/17
- 収集日
- 2026/08/03
- 鮮度
- 確認期限内
- 確認段階
- 自動処理
- 記録状態
- 公開
日本語要約(機械生成)
本研究は、急性肝不全の重篤な合併症である肝性脳症(HE)に対する分岐鎖アミノ酸(BCAA)静脈内投与(IV-BCAA)の効果を評価するため、ランダム化比較試験(RCT)の系統的レビューとメタ分析を行った。MEDLINE、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials、医学中央雑誌を検索し、急性期(入院後7日未満)の成人HE患者にIV-BCAAまたはプラセボを投与したRCTを対象とした。主要評価項目は全死因死亡率と意識障害の改善、副次評価項目は悪心や下痢などの合併症発生率とした。2073件のスクリーニングから4件のRCTが適格で、219名(IV-BCAA群109名、プラセボ群110名)を解析した。その結果、意識障害の改善(リスク比1.26、95%信頼区間0.96-1.66)と死亡率(リスク比0.90、95%信頼区間0.70-1.16)は両群間で有意差がなく、悪心・下痢の発生率も有意差はなかった。結論として、IV-BCAA投与は急性HEに対してプラセボと比較して有意な効果を示さず、さらなるRCTの必要性が示唆された。
この要約は公開抄録のみを根拠にAIが機械的に生成したものです。正確な内容は原文を確認してください。
抄録
Background: Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a severe complication of acute hepatic failure requiring urgent critical care management. Branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) such as leucine, isoleucine, and valine have been investigated as potential treatments to improve outcomes in patients with acute HE. However, the effectiveness of BCAA administration during the acute phase remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of intravenous BCAA (IV-BCAA) treatment on clinical outcomes in patients with acute HE by systematically reviewing and analyzing randomized controlled trials (RCTs).Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature search of MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Igaku Chuo Zasshi (ICHUSHI), a Japanese database for medical literature. We included RCTs involving adult patients with acute HE who received IV-BCAA or placebo during the acute phase after admission (< 7 days). Two reviewers independently screened the citations and extracted data. The primary "critical" outcomes were mortality from any cause and improvement in disturbance of consciousness. The secondary "important" outcome included the incidence of complications such as nausea and diarrhea. Risk ratios (RRs) were calculated using random effects models with inverse variance weighting.Results: Among the 2073 screened records, four met the criteria for quantitative analysis. The analysis included 219 patients: 109 received IV-BCAA, and 110 received placebo. Improvement in the disturbance of consciousness and mortality were not significantly different between the two groups (RR, 1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.96-1.66; RR, 0.90; 95% CI 0.70-1.16, respectively). Following IV-BCAA administration, the absolute differences of improvement in the disturbance of consciousness and mortality were 118 more per 1000 (95% CI 18 fewer-300 more) and 55 fewer per 1000 (95% CI 165 fewer-88 more), respectively. No significant differences were observed in the incidence of nausea or diarrhea between the two groups.Conclusions: Our meta-analysis demonstrates that all outcomes were not significantly different between IV-BCAA treatment and placebo for acute HE. Further RCTs are required to better understand IV-BCAA treatment potential in patients with HE.
DOI 10.1186/s40560-024-00771-x
PMID 39780295
原文・出典を見る →