ZERO WORLD RESEARCHアミノ酸・有機酸の学術文献データベース

Aspartame sensitivity? A double blind randomised crossover study.

アスパルテーム感受性?二重盲検無作為化クロスオーバー試験 (機械翻訳の邦題)

PloS one2015Sathyapalan T, Thatcher NJ, Hammersley R, et al.
研究デザインランダム化比較試験
対象ヒト

記録の確認項目

研究デザイン
ランダム化比較試験
対象
ヒト
出版年
2015
出典
doi.org
抄録の表示
表示あり
出版状態
訂正あり
状態確認日
2026/08/17
収集日
2026/08/03
鮮度
確認期限内
確認段階
自動処理
記録状態
公開

出版状態の注記

出版状態: 訂正あり

Europe PMC relationship metadata: corrected_by.

状態の根拠を見る →

日本語要約(機械生成)

アスパルテーム感受性を自覚する48人と非感受性の48人を対象に、アスパルテーム100mg含有スナックバーと対照バーの急性症状影響を比較した二重盲検無作為化クロスオーバー試験。14症状の反復評価、生化学、メタボノミクスを測定した。感受性群はベースラインで心理的差異、高トリグリセリド、低HDL-Cを示したが、症状評価ではアスパルテームと対照バー間、感受性群と非感受性群間に有意差はなかった。感受性群は初回セッションで多くの症状を報告したが、プラセボでも同様だった。GLP-1、GIP、チロシン、フェニルアラニンは両群で同様に変化した。結論として、アスパルテームの急性摂取による心理的・代謝的悪影響は検出されなかった。

この要約は公開抄録のみを根拠にAIが機械的に生成したものです。正確な内容は原文を確認してください。

抄録

Background: Aspartame is a commonly used intense artificial sweetener, being approximately 200 times sweeter than sucrose. There have been concerns over aspartame since approval in the 1980s including a large anecdotal database reporting severe symptoms. The objective of this study was to compare the acute symptom effects of aspartame to a control preparation.Methods: This was a double-blind randomized cross over study conducted in a clinical research unit in United Kingdom. Forty-eight individual who has self reported sensitivity to aspartame were compared to 48 age and gender matched aspartame non-sensitive individuals. They were given aspartame (100mg)-containing or control snack bars randomly at least 7 days apart. The main outcome measures were acute effects of aspartame measured using repeated ratings of 14 symptoms, biochemistry and metabonomics.Results: Aspartame sensitive and non-sensitive participants differed psychologically at baseline in handling feelings and perceived stress. Sensitive participants had higher triglycerides (2.05 ± 1.44 vs. 1.26 ± 0.84mmol/L; p value 0.008) and lower HDL-C (1.16 ± 0.34 vs. 1.35 ± 0.54 mmol/L; p value 0.04), reflected in 1H NMR serum analysis that showed differences in the baseline lipid content between the two groups. Urine metabonomic studies showed no significant differences. None of the rated symptoms differed between aspartame and control bars, or between sensitive and control participants. However, aspartame sensitive participants rated more symptoms particularly in the first test session, whether this was placebo or control. Aspartame and control bars affected GLP-1, GIP, tyrosine and phenylalanine levels equally in both aspartame sensitive and non-sensitive subjects.Conclusion: Using a comprehensive battery of psychological tests, biochemistry and state of the art metabonomics there was no evidence of any acute adverse responses to aspartame. This independent study gives reassurance to both regulatory bodies and the public that acute ingestion of aspartame does not have any detectable psychological or metabolic effects in humans.Trial registration: ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN39650237.

MeSH

AdultAgedAspartameCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSweetening AgentsTriglycerides

DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0116212

PMID 25786106

原文・出典を見る →