Comparison of effects of modafinil and caffeine on fatigue-vulnerable and fatigue-resistant aircrew after a limited period of sleep deprivation.
限られた睡眠剥奪後の疲労脆弱性および疲労耐性航空要員に対するモダフィニルとカフェインの効果の比較 (機械翻訳の邦題)
記録の確認項目
- 研究デザイン
- その他の原著論文
- 対象
- 未確定
- 出版年
- 2023
- 出典
- doi.org
- 抄録の表示
- 表示あり
- 出版状態
- 有効な記録
- 状態確認日
- 2026/08/17
- 収集日
- 2026/08/03
- 鮮度
- 確認期限内
- 確認段階
- 自動処理
- 記録状態
- 公開
日本語要約(機械生成)
本研究は、限られた睡眠剥奪後の疲労脆弱性および疲労耐性の航空要員に対するカフェインとモダフィニルの効果を比較した。オランダ空軍の健康な職員32名を対象に、無作為化比較試験を実施した。被験者は深夜にカフェイン300mg、モダフィニル200mg、またはプラセボを投与され、翌朝8時まで精神運動覚醒テスト、警戒・追跡テスト、スタンフォード眠気尺度を6回実施した。プラセボ夜のPVTの失策数に基づき、被験者を疲労脆弱群、中間群、疲労耐性群に分類した。その結果、治療はPVTパラメータ、VigTrack平均反応時間、SSSに有意な効果を示し、疲労群はPVT全パラメータとVigTrack平均欠落率に有意な効果を示し、中間群と耐性群は脆弱群より良好な成績だった。治療と疲労群の交互作用はPVT失策数で有意だった。疲労耐性の分類は睡眠剥奪時の刺激薬への反応を予測できる可能性が示された。
この要約は公開抄録のみを根拠にAIが機械的に生成したものです。正確な内容は原文を確認してください。
抄録
Introduction: Literature suggests pilots experience fatigue differently. So-called fatigue-resistant or -vulnerable individuals might also respond differently to countermeasures or stimulants. This study, which is part of a larger randomized controlled clinical trial, aims to investigate the effect of caffeine and modafinil on fatigue-resistant and -vulnerable pilots. Methods: This study included 32 healthy employees of the Royal Netherlands Air Force, who completed three test days, separated by at least 7 days. After a regular work day, the subjects were randomly administered either 300 mg caffeine, 200 mg modafinil or placebo at midnight. Hereafter the subjects performed the psychomotor vigilance test (PVT), vigilance and tracking test (VigTrack) and Stanford sleepiness scale (SSS) six times until 8 a.m. the next day. Subjects were ranked on the average number of lapses on the PVT during the placebo night and divided into three groups: fatigue-vulnerable (FVUL), -intermediate (FINT) and -resistant (FRES), with 11, 10 and 11 subjects in each group, respectively. Area under the curve (AUC) of the PVT, VigTrack and SSS during the test nights were calculated, which were used in univariate factorial analysis of variance (ANOVA). Tukey's HSD post hoc tests were used to differentiate between the groups. Results: A significant effect of treatment was found in the ANOVA of both PVT parameters, VigTrack mean reaction time and SSS. There was a statistically significant effect of fatigue group on all PVT parameters and VigTrack mean percentage omissions, where FINT and FRES scored better than FVUL. There was a significant interaction effect between treatment and fatigue group for PVT number of lapses. This is congruent for the AUC analyses in which for all parameters (except for the SSS) the performance of the FVUL group was consistently worse than that of the FINT and FRES groups. Discussion: This study demonstrates that the performance of individuals with different fatigue tolerances are differently affected by simulants after a limited period of sleep deprivation. The classification of fatigue tolerance through PVT lapses when sleep deprived seems to be able to predict this.
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2023.1303758
PMID 38260091
原文・出典を見る →