Is injectable platelet rich fibrin beneficial in managing intracapsular temporomandibular disorders? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
関節腔内顎関節症の管理における注射用血小板 rich fibrin の有用性:系統的レビューとメタ分析 (機械翻訳の邦題)
記録の確認項目
- 研究デザイン
- メタ分析
- 対象
- ヒト
- 出版年
- 2025
- 出典
- doi.org
- 抄録の表示
- 表示あり
- 出版状態
- 有効な記録
- 状態確認日
- 2026/08/17
- 収集日
- 2026/08/04
- 鮮度
- 確認期限内
- 確認段階
- 自動処理
- 記録状態
- 公開
日本語要約(機械生成)
本研究は、顎関節内部障害および顎関節症に対する注射用血小板 rich fibrin (i-PRF) の有効性を評価するため、コクラン、PubMed/MEDLINE、Google Scholar を対象に系統的レビューとメタ分析を行った。無作為化比較試験6件(計270名、女性75%)を分析した結果、i-PRF は対照群と比較して疼痛を有意に減少させ(SMD = -2.16)、最大開口量(SMD = 2.46)および側方運動(SMD = 1.35)を有意に改善したが、前方運動には有意差はなかった。関節音と円板位置の改善は質的に報告された。異質性は高く、12ヶ月までの改善が示唆されるが、さらなる試験が必要である。
この要約は公開抄録のみを根拠にAIが機械的に生成したものです。正確な内容は原文を確認してください。
抄録
Objective: To highlight the current knowledge of the effectiveness of injectable platelet rich fibrin (i-PRF) in the management of temporomandibular joint internal derangement (TMJ-ID) and temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis (TMJ-OA).Methodology: A "Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome" (PICO) strategy was implemented by performing a systematic search through Cochrane databases, PubMed/MEDLINE, and Google Scholar from their commencement to November 2024. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) addressing the management of TMJ-ID and TMJ-OA with i-PRF were included. Two reviewers independently evaluated the suitability of the RCTs, followed by data extraction.Results: The electronic search revealed 274 articles, but only 6 studies were deemed suitable for selection, with a total of 270 subjects; 75% were females, and 25% were males. Meta-analysis revealed a significant reduction in pain levels with i-PRF compared to controls (pooled SMD = - 2.16; 95% CI = - 3.43 to - 0.89; P < 0.001). Significant improvement was also observed in maximum mouth opening (SMD = 2.46; 95% CI = 0.56 to 4.36; P = 0.02). i-PRF significantly enhanced lateral mandibular movements compared with controls (SMD = 1.35; 95% CI = 0.03 to 2.67; P = 0.048), whereas no significant difference was found for protrusive movements (SMD = 1.76; 95% CI = - 0.97 to 4.48; P = 0.11). Improvements in joint sounds and disc position were qualitatively reported in smaller subsets of studies. Substantial heterogeneity (I² = 83-93%) was observed across outcomes, reflecting variability in study design and treatment protocols.Conclusion: Current evidence suggests that i-PRF provides improvements in TMJ pain, joint sounds, and mandibular movements for up to 12 months. However, more RCTs are needed.
MeSH
DOI 10.1186/s12903-025-07331-1
PMID 41366348
原文・出典を見る →