ZERO WORLD RESEARCHLiterature database on amino acids & organic acids

Association of l-Arginine Supplementation with Markers of Endothelial Function in Patients with Cardiovascular or Metabolic Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Nutrients2018Rodrigues-Krause J, Krause M, Rocha IMGD, et al.
Study designMeta-analysis
SubjectHuman

Record checks

Study design
Meta-analysis
Subject
Human
Publication year
2018
Source
doi.org
Abstract display
Shown here
Publication status
Active
Status checked
17 Aug 2026
Collected
13 Aug 2026
Freshness
Current
Review stage
Automated
Record status
Published

Abstract

l-Arginine supplementation is a potential therapy for treating cardiovascular and metabolic diseases. However, the use of distinct l-arginine sources, intervened populations, and treatment regimens may have yielded confusion about their efficacy. This research constitutes a systematic review and meta-analysis summarizing the effects of l-arginine supplementation compared to placebo in individuals with cardiovascular disease (CVD), obesity, or diabetes. Eligibility criteria included randomized clinical trials and interventions based on oral supplementation of l-arginine with a minimum duration of three days; comparison groups consisted of individuals with the same disease condition receiving an oral placebo substance. The primary outcome was flow-mediated dilation, and secondary outcomes were nitrite/nitrate (NOx) rate and asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA). Statistical heterogeneity among studies included in the meta-analyses was assessed using the inconsistency index (I2). Fifty-four full-text articles from 3761 retrieved references were assessed for eligibility. After exclusions, 13 studies were included for data extraction. There was no difference in blood flow after post-ischemic hyperemia between the supplementation of l-arginine and placebo groups before and after the intervention period (standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.30; 95% confidence intervals (CIs) = -0.85 to 1.46; I2 = 96%). Sensitivity analysis showed decreased heterogeneity when the studies that most favor arginine and placebo were removed, and positive results in favor of arginine supplementation were found (SMD = 0.59; 95% CIs = 0.10 to 1.08; I2 = 75%). No difference was found in meta-analytical estimates of NOx and ADMA responses between arginine or placebo treatments. Overall, the results indicated that oral l-arginine supplementation was not associated with improvements on selected variables in these patients (PROSPERO Registration: CRD42017077289).

MeSH

AdultAgedArginineCardiovascular DiseasesDiabetes MellitusDietary SupplementsEndothelium, VascularFemaleHumansHyperemiaMaleMiddle AgedNitratesNitritesObesityTreatment Outcome

DOI 10.3390/nu11010015

PMID 30577559

View source →