Association of l-Arginine Supplementation with Markers of Endothelial Function in Patients with Cardiovascular or Metabolic Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
心血管疾患または代謝障害患者におけるL-アルギニン補充と内皮機能マーカーとの関連:系統的レビューとメタ分析 (機械翻訳の邦題)
記録の確認項目
- 研究デザイン
- メタ分析
- 対象
- ヒト
- 出版年
- 2018
- 出典
- doi.org
- 抄録の表示
- 表示あり
- 出版状態
- 有効な記録
- 状態確認日
- 2026/08/17
- 収集日
- 2026/08/13
- 鮮度
- 確認期限内
- 確認段階
- 自動処理
- 記録状態
- 公開
日本語要約(機械生成)
L-アルギニン補充は心血管疾患や代謝疾患の治療法として期待されるが、その効果は一貫していない。本研究は、心血管疾患、肥満、糖尿病を有する患者を対象に、L-アルギニン経口補充の効果をプラセボと比較したランダム化比較試験を系統的にレビューし、メタ分析を行った。主要アウトカムは血流依存性血管拡張反応、副次アウトカムは亜硝酸/硝酸塩および非対称性ジメチルアルギニンとした。13試験が対象となり、全体ではL-アルギニン補充は血流依存性血管拡張反応に有意な改善を示さなかったが、感度分析では特定の研究を除外すると改善が認められた。副次アウトカムにも差はなかった。結論として、L-アルギニン補充はこれらの患者の選択された変数を改善しなかった。
この要約は公開抄録のみを根拠にAIが機械的に生成したものです。正確な内容は原文を確認してください。
抄録
l-Arginine supplementation is a potential therapy for treating cardiovascular and metabolic diseases. However, the use of distinct l-arginine sources, intervened populations, and treatment regimens may have yielded confusion about their efficacy. This research constitutes a systematic review and meta-analysis summarizing the effects of l-arginine supplementation compared to placebo in individuals with cardiovascular disease (CVD), obesity, or diabetes. Eligibility criteria included randomized clinical trials and interventions based on oral supplementation of l-arginine with a minimum duration of three days; comparison groups consisted of individuals with the same disease condition receiving an oral placebo substance. The primary outcome was flow-mediated dilation, and secondary outcomes were nitrite/nitrate (NOx) rate and asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA). Statistical heterogeneity among studies included in the meta-analyses was assessed using the inconsistency index (I2). Fifty-four full-text articles from 3761 retrieved references were assessed for eligibility. After exclusions, 13 studies were included for data extraction. There was no difference in blood flow after post-ischemic hyperemia between the supplementation of l-arginine and placebo groups before and after the intervention period (standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.30; 95% confidence intervals (CIs) = -0.85 to 1.46; I2 = 96%). Sensitivity analysis showed decreased heterogeneity when the studies that most favor arginine and placebo were removed, and positive results in favor of arginine supplementation were found (SMD = 0.59; 95% CIs = 0.10 to 1.08; I2 = 75%). No difference was found in meta-analytical estimates of NOx and ADMA responses between arginine or placebo treatments. Overall, the results indicated that oral l-arginine supplementation was not associated with improvements on selected variables in these patients (PROSPERO Registration: CRD42017077289).
MeSH
DOI 10.3390/nu11010015
PMID 30577559
原文・出典を見る →